Personified Approach To Fertility Restoration In Women After Surgery On Ovarian Endometriosis

Autor/innen

Abstract

Study aimed to analyze and substantiate a personified (individualized) approach to fertility restoration in women after surgical treatment of ovarian endometriosis, with emphasis on minimizing damage to ovarian reserve and improving reproductive outcomes. An analytical review of modern scientific literature was conducted for the period 2018–2025. The search was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and eLIBRARY.ru databases, as well as in clinical guidelines of ESHRE, ASRM, and World Endometriosis Society. Laparoscopic cystectomy leads to a significant reduction in anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels: 30–45% in unilateral and 50–70% in bilateral cases. Ablative techniques better preserve ovarian reserve (AMH reduction 10–25%) but are associated with a higher recurrence rate (25–45%). A personified approach considering patient age, baseline ovarian reserve, extent of disease, reproductive plans, and psychosocial factors increases spontaneous pregnancy rates to 15–35% and improves IVF outcomes. The personified approach is the most effective strategy for fertility restoration after surgery for ovarian endometriosis. Its implementation, based on comprehensive preoperative assessment of ovarian reserve and individualized selection of surgical and reproductive tactics, allows minimization of iatrogenic damage and significant improvement of reproductive outcomes.

Literaturhinweise

Burney, R. O., & Giudice, L. C. (2020). Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Fertility and Sterility, 113(5), 922–932.

American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2021). Endometriosis and infertility: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 116(1), 5–13.

Johnson, N. P., & Hummelshoj, L. (2022). Consensus on current management of endometriosis. Human Reproduction Update, 28(3), 245–267.

Vercellini, P., et al. (2023). Surgical treatment of endometriosis: Benefits and risks for fertility. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 30(4), 412–425.

Kitajima, M., et al. (2021). Ovarian reserve in women with endometriomas: A systematic review. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 19(1), 88.

Raffi, F., et al. (2022). Impact of ovarian endometrioma surgery on ovarian reserve markers. Human Reproduction, 37(2), 310–322.

Somigliana, E., et al. (2023). Fertility preservation strategies in women with endometriosis. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 85, 101–112.

Dunselman, G. A. J., et al. (2020). European guideline on management of endometriosis. Gynecological Surgery, 17(1), 1–16.

Arafat, A., et al. (2022). IVF outcomes in women with endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 45(3), 567–579.

Ferrero, S., et al. (2021). Surgery for endometrioma and reproductive outcome: A critical appraisal. Fertility and Sterility, 115(4), 987–996.

Saunders, P. T. K., et al. (2023). Psychological impact of endometriosis and fertility challenges. Human Reproduction Update, 29(1), 55–70.

ESHRE Endometriosis Guideline Group. (2022). Management of women with endometriosis. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Guidelines, 1–78.

Veröffentlicht

2026-05-19

Zitationsvorschlag

Agababyan, L., & Shonazarova, S. (2026). Personified Approach To Fertility Restoration In Women After Surgery On Ovarian Endometriosis. Frontiers of Global Science, 4(1), 27–30. Abgerufen von https://www.scissmed.com/index.php/pub/article/view/64